heart + stomach
Innerbrat
Advancing the sum total of human knowledge and endeavour!
Iron Man rocks, and if you disagree, you're wrong. 
9th-May-2008 04:28 pm
comics
It has long been an established bad habit of mine when I like a thing, to dismiss the opinion of everyone who disagrees with me, with you just don't get it. As I've matured, I like to think this tendency has faded, so something has to be really really good to invoke that same reaction again.

Something like Iron Man.

When I knew there was going to be an Iron Man movie, I admit I was a little apprehensive. I'd defy anyone to be, if the last Marvelverse movie they'd allowed themselves to be persuaded to see was 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer. But I committed myself on the strength of steely_glint's gay crush on Robert Downey jr, and you've got to hand it to Sam - he done well on this one.

I don't really think this film can be spoiled - it's just not that type of story. But I'll cut anyway.

So: Reasons why Iron Man rocked, and why people who say it didn't are just wrong.

1. It understands comics.

My worries about the movie gave way to excited apprehension when I read the London Paper's review. They were very complimentary about it as a story and a visual treat, but ended with the sentiment (and I paraphrase from memory):
But with the focus on characterisation over adrenaline-fuelled action sequences, the fanboys may find themselves disappointed.
That's just it, and what some superhero movies seem to not understand about 'fanboys' - and for 'fanboys', read 'me': this is my opinion here. We don't read and re-read and obsess about decades worth of stories revolving around a limited number of characters because we like the one or two pages per comic of fighting. Some of us might, but that's not what we end up talking about afterwards. Comics are about the characters. They're also about the fantastic: even comics that don't feature superpowered aliens or gadget-loving multimillionaires have some 'concept' that required some suspension of disbelief; but by the time a character has been written by dozens of writers over forty years, his draw is not 'let's watch a man in a metal suit beat up some bad guys' but 'I can't get enough of this guy.'

I don't know much about the comicsverse Iron Man - I tried to read Civil War and my brain melted. I'm a DC girl through and through, although at some point I'm sure I'll read all those Marvel comics that have been recommended to me. The point is, I can't judge whether or not the movie was a true and fair representation of the Tony, Pepper, Jim and Obadiah of the comics. I'd never even heard of War Machine before a quick wiki search to prove the hunch given by that one throwaway line. But I am a comic fanboy, and I loved the emphasis on character growth and themes over robot fights. I love robot fights, but I like to know there's a person involved, and from the very first line of the movie, I knew Tony Stark was a person.

As (hopefully) the first movie in a series, or at the least a standalone superhero movie, Iron Man is an origin story, which can be both a good and bad thing - good, because origin stories are very popular and often make good stories, but bad because everyone knows the major origin stories, and there are precedents to follow. The standard trope goes like this: a person with unusual resources undergoes an epiphany and starts to use those resources in a particular way to fight bad guys. The resources are important, and not always 'super' - Peter Parker was bitten by a spider, but Bruce Wayne had a brain and lots of money, as does Stark - the suit is merely a result of that brain and money. But it's not the abilities that make the hero, or the origin story, but second part: the epiphany. As Stephen Couchman explains on the Pharyngula reaction thread:
The bit in these superhero films that always interests me is where the protagonist stops being the character we've slowly been getting to know and believe in for the duration of the first act, and suddenly becomes the iconic figure whose name is in the title.
Spiderman was not born when Peter Parker was bitten, but when Uncle Ben died. Oliver Queen had to live as a hermit before he realised he could use his archery skills for more that distraction. In the same way, while the seeds of Iron Man might have been planted by Jensen in the cave, it wasn't until Tony Stark made the decision to return to his old companion's home village to right the travesties being committed there, that the hero was born. Jon Favreau understands how important is that part of the story, and he gives it the importance it deserves - setting it right in the narrative centre of the film with appropriate lead up and suitable follow through. This wasn't a story of 'hero fights bad guys', but the personal story of Tony Stark.

2. Tony Stark

Talking of which - holy crap it's nice to have a flawed hero who's still a hero. The movie may be called Iron Man, but really it's the Tony Stark show, and that's no bad thing. Tony's frivolous, self-important and utterly utterly selfish, and the movie reflects it. There's not a single scene that's not about Tony Stark. Even if he's not on-screen people are talking about him. The motivations of every single character revolves around Tony Stark, including his own. He builds the suit to save his own life. He stops his company producing weapons in order to cleanse his own conscience. He flies off to Afghanistan not (just) to save lives, but because those are his weapons being used and he won't stand for it. The difference between pre- and post-epiphany Tonys is not one of selflessness, but that his drive for self-gratification has been converted to a drive for redemption. Not once does he actually consider someone else: observe his treatment of Pepper when she's afraid for his life. Even at the end, when he rejects the possibility of a secret identity, it's do bask in the glory of being Iron Man, because it's fantastic. The whole thing acknowledges that even good deeds can be done for selfish reasons, and a 'good guy' is not the same as a 'nice guy'.

And unlike with Batman, who's really not a nice guy despite pursuing a noble crusade for justice - Tony's just so Bobdamn likeable. That awesome, cute bastard.

3. That Line.

You know the one. If you've read to this point you've either seen the movie or don't mind spoilers so have read it elsewhere. You know it rocked. you've probably said it yourself.

4. Pepper Potts.

Lisa Kansas on Punkassblog states:
This is the most misogynist comic-book-superhero movie I’ve seen in years.
And honestly, I don't know whether to pity the person who never got to see the awesome parts of Batman Begins: the ones that don't include the unbearable Katie holmes character (who the hell was she, again?), or envy her for not ever having to sit through Fantastic Four. I'll just wonder whether she's seen any superhero movies at all ever.

Pepper was amazing on so very many levels: and I'm the person these days who sits back and looks for problems from a feminist front. I wanted to get angry and bitter, but I couldn't. And when I got back and looked at reaction posts, I found everything I had to say nicely summed up on the Hathor Legacy. Pepper has the narrative role of being the non-heroic foil to Tony Stark: the Alfred to his Batman, the Xander to his Buffy, the Ando to his Hiro, and- actually, I can't think of a female example, although maybe season 1 and 2 Willow comes close. Neither sidekick nor damsel, she rejects the role of love-interest because Tony's not just her boss, but also a well established womanising jerk, and she shows her contempt for women who let him treat them like that very early on.

She has her flaws - the most significant one being that she's so fond of an utter git like Tony Stark - but she makes up for them by being so invaluably sensible in everything except not taking off her watch and gold ring before performing open heart surgery near a powerful electromagnet.but you can't have everything.

It's an important role, and as pointed out, again on Pharyngula, Pepper's sense and intelligence actually save the day:
When [Stane] walked in on her, I was expecting the standard plot development - the bad guy takes the girl sidekick/love interest hostage, and the hero has to rescue her. Nope! She conceals what she's doing long enough to bluff her way out of the office, and then walks straight to the SHIELD agent in the lobby. That was the moment Stane was defeated - everything that followed from then on was just damage control.
Yes, the movie fails the Dykes to Watch Out For litmus test, but I've covered that: the movie was about Tony Stark's ego to the point where no one, ever, male or female talks about anything other than Tony Stark. That's clearly of dramatic significance and just makes the ride more thrilling.

I just don't understand why people are therefore complaining that Pepper sucks because she didn't put on a suit and fly around - yes, it's a shame that people aren't making movies out Birds of Prey (TV adaptations in which Dinah's a teenage psychic not withstanding) or Batgirl, but that's not Iron Man's fault. It's not even Iron Man's problem. The non-heroic foil is such a generally great character and to reduce her to a sidekick would be insulting, and unnecessary. From what I understand of the comics from the internet discussions, they've taken a minor comic character and given her actual agency. This is a great thing, and a vast improvement on Marvel movies' current record with female characters (X3, anyone?)

I'm sure we were supposed to come out shipping Pepper/Tony, but I sure as Hells didn't. Not only was her rejection of him sensible and responsible, but any attraction they seemed to have anyway seemed to come of the fact that they lived such insulated lives. Personally, I saw the contrast between misogynistic-frivolous pre-cave promiscuous Tony and dedicated, redemption seeking Tony trying to ask Pepper out, and all I saw was a man trying to be 'good' for the first time in his life and mistaking nobility with monogamy, and friendship for love. I don't know if I was meat to see it that way, but the movie didn't contradict it.

Now all I need is for the sequels to confirm that they're wrong together and I'll be happy.

5. The Soundtrack

It started with AC/DC, it ended with Black Sabbath, and in the meantime we had an amazing adrenaline fuelled score that on occasion had me playing half-arsed air guitar in my seat. I don't usually give much thought to film scores, but this was amazing.

6. You will believe a man can fly!

I don't just mean the special effects here - although the special effects were of that top notch can't tell where the real dinosaurs end and the fake ones begin smoothness.  No, I mean the way the story was told around the crappy comic fantaskiffy* in a way that made you accept it. The suit moved in realistic ways: it reacted to gravity and explosions and bullets in ways you could buy, and the way each manufacturing scene showed him working on a different part, I could see the suit grow up organically around his body and in his mind. People walked seamlessly in this supertech home, and it was obvious how the suit worked and what Tony was doing in it.

And not just the suit- Jarvis and the robots were characters in their own right, but still computers. there was no 'man on intercom' feel like you get with Red Dwarf's Holly or the Heart of Gold's Eddie. Jarvis was very obviously a computer, albeit one with a sarcasm chip. By ignoring the crap science, or mentioning it in passing where necessary, the movie integrated it in perfectly, so not only did I accept that Tony Stark could be kept alive by a glowing blue thing (that he built in a... you know the rest), but I started wondering why we don't have iron suits to go flying in. Stupid real world physics.

7. Robert Downey Jr's Arse

Oh come on, allow me a little objectification!

8. The end-credit sequence.


*Fanta-sci-fi

View this post in: My Style | Your Style | Light format
Opinions 
9th-May-2008 03:36 pm (UTC)
Yes, I agree with everything you say about Iron Man! :)

But I must also hold my hand up and expose myself to the inevitable ridicule by confessing that I actually like both Fantastic Four films!
9th-May-2008 03:40 pm (UTC)
Ouch.

I'd ask why, but I don't think I'd believe you.
9th-May-2008 03:54 pm (UTC)
I don't think they're great or anything, and they're clearly not in the same league as Iron Man, but I just think they're unpretentious little popcorn flicks, and they capture the fun of the comics. I always found the FF to be pretty light-weight and ridiculous, and the films reflect that.

Admittedly, the second one was a bit rubbish and they mishandled Galactus badly, but I thought the first one was fun.
9th-May-2008 04:06 pm (UTC)
We got the 2nd one from LoveFilm yesterday—we were going to watch it last night but we, um got a bit distracted.

Is it bad? We liked the first, despite them somehow managing to make Alba unnatractive (how they managed that is beyond me but they did), so were kinda looking forward to the second...
9th-May-2008 04:13 pm (UTC)
yes.
9th-May-2008 04:43 pm (UTC)
I wouldn't say it's bad. It's a decent popcorn cruncher, and thankfully it is not another Catwoman, or Daredevil or Elektra level of bad. There are a few things I didn't like about it, but honestly, I don't think they bungled Galactus in it, because really... look at the comic version. He's a 200 foot tall white guy wearing blue and fuschia armor. That shit wouldn't fly in a movie. It just wouldn't.

If there is one thing done dead fucking on in the second FF movie, it is Doom. He is so much more Doom then in the previous movie. Doom. Doom. Doom.
9th-May-2008 05:06 pm (UTC)
But I wanted the 200 foot tall guy in the fuscia armour! :(

I like the way they hinted at the shape of his helmet in the swirly clouds, but I reckon if you're going to use the character at all, you should try to make it as faithful to the comics as possible. Still, as the director hints in the commentary, it's possible there was a 200 foot tall guy in a spaceship behind that cloud, we just didn;t get to see him... :)
9th-May-2008 05:03 pm (UTC)
It's not bad, it just doesn't make the best use of the whole Galactus/Silver Surfer scenario. They seem to have gotten cold feet and so it feels like a bit of a cop-out. And the light tone is a bit at odds with the "end of the world" plot.

Still, if you liked the first one I'd say there's a good chance you'll like the second too.

And the Silver Surfer is cool. :)

despite them somehow managing to make Alba unnatractive

I know what you mean. I wouldn't say she was exactly unattractive, but she did look weird with blonde hair and blue contacts. I'd rather they'd just gone with a brunette Sue Storm, or cast someone else really.
10th-May-2008 12:31 am (UTC)
It didn't help that in all the posters they airbrushed her to look fairly pale, and yet in the film she's blue-eyed, with bleach-blonde hair, but her skin tone isn't far off Dale Winton. What makes it odder is that it isn'tnearly so noticeable in the first one.
9th-May-2008 03:41 pm (UTC)
Y'know I just wanted to see it as a bit of fluff to pass the time, nad watch men in robot suits knock the crap out of each other. What I got was so much better.
9th-May-2008 03:44 pm (UTC)
Which line? I'm so confused.

And I loved that they didn't make pepper romantic interest. All during the dancing scene i was sitting there going "No, don't do it, don't do it!" Normally, i don't partiularrily care for Gwennyth Paltrow, but, damn, i didn't know it was her til the credits rolled!
12th-May-2008 07:20 pm (UTC)
Ditto.
9th-May-2008 03:47 pm (UTC)
Word.

On Point 4? If anyone is the sidekick, it's Rhodey. Now, I loves me some War Machine, but in this film he really was just the helpful best friend. Next film, oh man, I really hope we get som War Machine action.
9th-May-2008 03:50 pm (UTC)
I loved Rhodey in this. I'm not usually a fan of sidekicks in movies - but that's probably Schumaker's fault, and I trust Favreau.

Actually, after this, I'd trust Favreau with my life.
9th-May-2008 03:57 pm (UTC)
Seriously. After reading Favreau's interviews about Iron Man, and the sheer way he got what he needed to do (and then seeing that the movie he made backed up his words), I am all for Favreau being trusted with just about any Marvel property he wants to play with.
9th-May-2008 03:53 pm (UTC)
Favreau is money. He's so damn money.
9th-May-2008 03:54 pm (UTC)
...I admit it, I read this post just because you Twittered about kicking "for porn".

And I nodded and grinned and looked forward to seeing the movie in a few hours and giggled at RDJ's arse being given its own point.

And then I got to the comments.





AND LAUGHED MY FOOL ASS OFF.
9th-May-2008 04:03 pm (UTC)
Debi? PLZ2B leavin ma hed?

See, I was going to write up a review last weekend, but, y'know, didn't. Those two quotes from the Pharyngula thread? The exact quotes you pulled? Are the two I noted down to put in it.

You are scaring me now.

OTOH, re your cut text and the impossibility of spoilers? I give you the Worst Mod Ever:
http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/1107352.html
9th-May-2008 04:05 pm (UTC)
Those are the quotes Dave offered, actually. I stoile them wholesale from him.

And no, it's comfortable in here, and I'm quote enjoying having Alan Rickman serve me drinks.

Nice outfit you've got him in, BTW.
9th-May-2008 04:08 pm (UTC)
Oh yeah, so he did. OK, I read the thread after following his link and didn't tie in the bits I marked with the bits he quoted. Stoopid subconcious.

And the outfit was SB's idea. As always.
10th-May-2008 12:39 am (UTC)
NOES! U iz all in Mai brane!
9th-May-2008 04:12 pm (UTC)
OK, I could write a post on why I generally avoid spoilers like the plague, usually. And because my brain works the way it does, I'm very easy to spoil. Like right now, I've not read this week's Buffy, but I've guessed just from the titles of posts linked to on WFA what's most likely to happen, and now, if it happens, I won't be shocked at al. I'm already pre-emptively annyoed at the predictability of something.

So usually, I'm all anti-spoiler. but only if the spoiled part is supposed to have 'shock value'. (like the end-credit sequence)

Tony Stark=Iron Man wtf?
10th-May-2008 12:19 am (UTC)
Sometimes I don't mind spoilers, and sometimes I do. I knew that Pepper was going to be as awesome as she was- but it didn't bother me, because it isn't presented as a plot twist that you don't see coming.

I do agree with the comments on the journal Matt linked to. I'm not massively bothered by a lot of spoilers- frankly if something's been out (and popular) for more than 10 years (or maybe less) then many of the plot points will have made it into popular culture (I can't count how many "I am your father" jokes there are in films these days). If the twist is well concealed then I'll be happy- even if I already know what it is. In some cases that's all a film has going for it. I have no urgency to see The Sixth Sense again, for instance.
9th-May-2008 05:34 pm (UTC)
I was so desperately impressed with Pepper for being a strong woman without being Ass Kicking Chick, for being believable, and for taking Tony in hand with familiarity and no whiny crushing - it's clear she is very fond of him, and that she's occasionally attracted to him, but it's also clear she knows him far too well to think that's a good idea, going out with him.

And I adored the suit itself so much I want to take it out on a date. It was beautiful. I LOVED the way it moved.

Also RDJr is such a phenomenally wonderful man when he's playing snarky alcoholics. Ref. KKBB. <3 him. And Paul Bettany as Jarvis! It was a delight.
9th-May-2008 08:16 pm (UTC)
... I just laughed so hard at the new text added to the end of all of the comments on your LJ. A+!!!! Also, I totally loved Rhodey, too; he was one of my favorite parts of the movie ("Next time you ride with me, okay?" skdjfisoidjgs;d'sdgls), and I was sad he didn't have more screen time. Iron Man 2, baby! GLEEEEEEE.
9th-May-2008 11:22 pm (UTC)
Canonically, as I understand it, Tony and Pepper will-they-won't-they a while, and then she says 'fuckit' and hooks up with (and eventually marries) his chaffeur, Happy Hogan, a nice, sensible, ordinary guy who happens to be inside her limited orbit.

Jon Favreau put himself in the film as Happy--Tony races him to the plane, and he's there a few other scenes, I think.
10th-May-2008 12:33 am (UTC)
Peter Parker was bitten by a spider

and thus insured that I could never take him seriously again. Ever. Call it being Australian if you must, but over here? You get bitten by a strange spider? You damn well tell someone because it'll probably kill you. That...that was one suspension of disbelief I can't get over. I've just been raised too treat spiders as dangerous and that whole thing just struck me as being deeply, deeply wrong.

Also, I disliked the movies. Muchly.

As for the rest of it...word. Especially your thoughts on Pepper. She could have been useless, and she wasn't. She was herself and sensible.
10th-May-2008 01:27 am (UTC)
Just for your new 'end of comments' tag I am compelled to reply. By Tony Stark.
10th-May-2008 03:03 am (UTC)
I am over here applauding wildly.

Just so you know.
10th-May-2008 04:52 am (UTC)
I have nothing to contribute except 1) WORD to this entire post, especially the bit about Pepper Potts, and 2) I am another one in love with your new comment text. *giggling uncontrollably*
10th-May-2008 08:46 am (UTC)
Which AC/DC song did they use? If you tell me it's "Who Made Who" I'm running out to the cinema right now.

Despite the fact that would mean I was in the local fleapit wearing naught but a towel. *ahem*
10th-May-2008 10:08 am (UTC)
Back in Black, actually.
10th-May-2008 10:45 am (UTC)
Hmmm- good job I didn't go rushing out without asking, eh?

But thankyou for the non-spoiler-y review, I can now start to trawl my local cinema listings for showtimes without fear of The Phantom Menace Syndrome disappointment! :)
12th-May-2008 01:42 pm (UTC) - A frickin men
Anonymouse
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who saw the awesomeness in Pepper. Personally I believe that she knew that if she slept with Tony not only would he lose respect for her, but also that he would lose respect for himself. Also I question of some of the Pepper haters realize that if the character had been male things would largely be unchanged. She's Stark's personal assistant and the job is kind of a combination of gofer/enabler so the person you work for can ignore the mundane details to do what they do.

Peace
And
Long
Life

Toriach
http://1afinerworld.blogspot.com/
This page was loaded Aug 28th 2014, 1:00 am GMT.